Today's Messages (off)
| Unanswered Messages (on)
| Forum: All Idol, All The Time |
|---|
| Topic: Need Google AdSense Account |
|---|
| Need Google AdSense Account [message #3131] |
Tue, 10 August 2010 03:04 |
m.51ahesh
Messages: 1
Registered: August 2010 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Need Google AdSense Account
Looking For Google AdSense Account Approval.
You Came To The Right Place.
Just Visit This & Get Your Google AdSense Account ,
http://newadsenseaccount.wordpress.com/2010/08/10/need-googl e-adsense-account/
More Details :
I am Approving Google AdSense Accounts From The Past 1 Year.
100% Legal. No Gimmick. No Trick.
All Accounts Approved Manually By The Google AdSense Team.
So There Is No Problem Of Getting Your Account Banned.
If You Are Interested Then ,
Send Your Full Name,Address & Mobile Number To
"ADSENSEINCOME4ALL @ YAHOO . COM"
We Will Approve & Give Your Account Safely To You In 2 Days.
Good Luck In Google AdSense.
|
|
| | Topic: Re: SOTR - Clapton |
|---|
| | Topic: Re: Proposal for ATAI after AI |
|---|
| | Topic: Re: Steven Tyler on 'American Idol' -- 'I'm Doing It!' |
|---|
| | Topic: Re: OT -- I'm ready |
|---|
| Re: OT -- I'm ready [message #2949] |
Mon, 09 August 2010 00:23 |
azurespirit
Messages: 43
Registered: April 2008 |
Member |
|
|
"SLGreg" <SLGreg@youwish.com> wrote in message
news:0efe56p4st0qauobsko1him8n2i1k57cmq@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:46:21 -0700 (PDT), Fille
> <filledepaix3@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Aug 2, 1:18 am, SLGreg <SLG...@daedsiPFB.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 21:28:28 -0700, "fmomoon" <fmom...@comcast.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >"SLGreg" <SLG...@daedsiPFB.com> wrote in message
>>> >news:vlac56l1gkpfnokeheac66t4v4bmmrk4lm@4ax.com...
>>> >> On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 19:15:53 -0700 (PDT), "Tin@"
>>> >> <tinas49...@yahoo.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>>
>>> >>>On Aug 1, 7:09 pm, "fmomoon" <fmom...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>> >>>> "SLGreg" <SLG...@daedsiPFB.com> wrote in message
>>>
>>> >>>>news:9r7c56lidldl8psnd91rjaidlb7c0ub507@4ax.com...
>>>
>>> >>>> > On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 18:04:57 -0700 (PDT), Hoverman
>>> >>>> > <hoverman1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >>>> >>Bob, can I join Happy Land now?
>>>
>>> >>>> >>I'm ready.
>>>
>>> >>>> > The circus left town. Sorry, buddy. Tina "took it down" doncha'
>>> >>>> > know.
>>> >>>> > She's sprinkling us with her magic, demise-dust, too, right now,
>>> >>>> > as we
>>> >>>> > speak.
>>> >>>> > --
>>> >>>> > greg
>>>
>>> >>>> Oh no, Greg. Apparently, according to Tina, *you* coming into the
>>> >>>> group
>>> >>>> took it down. Doesn't that just make you feel all nice and
>>> >>>> powerful? :)
>>> >>>> --
>>> >>>> Moni
>>>
>>> >>>I didn't say that either, I said Blob's lies did. And Blobg's lie
>>> >>>did. If I had anything to do with it, once Blob banned me, then you
>>> >>>guys would still be there with 42 members. So, how did I impact
>>> >>>it...other than to expose Blob's lies?
>>>
>>> >> You didn't expose anything, idiot. You just wouldn't shut up about it
>>> >> (oh, surprise, Bob telling lies!), so he booted you out to shut you
>>> >> the fuck up. Something I wish we had the luxury of doing here.
>>> >> --
>>> >> greg
>>>
>>> >Tina, if you believed Bob to be a liar when you joined the group, then
>>> >the
>>> >problem is yours. Whether or not *I* believe anything Bob says isn't
>>> >the
>>> >issue. I knew what I was getting into when I joined. I wasn't fooled
>>> >because my opinion of Bob hasn't changed at all. I believe, if I'm to
>>> >believe your protestations of ignorance, you were fooled. Now who
>>> >looks
>>> >silly? I'm not in everyone's mind (although I am everyone), but I
>>> >believe
>>> >most people left because they were sick of *you.* Honestly, it took
>>> >way too
>>> >long for Bob to finally kick you out. I would have done it the first
>>> >day.
>>> >Heck, I wouldn't have allowed you in the group to begin with. Did some
>>> >follow you to your new group? Yes, I suppose they did and may you all
>>> >be
>>> >vewy vewy happy. As I have said before (sigh), Bob holds
>>> >responsibility,
>>> >ultimately, for what happened. He knows that. The only ones who left
>>> >because of Greg are in your merry band now. The only ones who left
>>> >because
>>> >of Bob are probably back here. The others? Who knows, but I wish them
>>> >well. Oh and there were 46 members when Greg and I showed up, not 42.
>>> >Some
>>> >left with the whole "Bonnie" fiasco. *sigh* But *that* was a whole
>>> >different kettle of fish that I never completely understood in the
>>> >first
>>> >place. I must say, my time there was interesting.
>>>
>>> Who are these people that reportedly left when I arrived? The ones I
>>> "chased away?"
>>> --
>>> greg
>>
>>I have the balls to tell you who, greg...................ME! I left
>>because you came in.
>
> What's that saying about sweat off my balls? I forget.
> --
> greg
Schweaty balls?
|
|
| | Topic: Re: OT -- I'm ready |
|---|
| Re: OT -- I'm ready [message #2903] |
Sun, 08 August 2010 03:57 |
azurespirit
Messages: 43
Registered: April 2008 |
Member |
|
|
"fmomoon" <fmomoon@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:v8OdnZwLUK3nisrRnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>
> "SLGreg" <SLGreg@youwish.com> wrote in message
> news:3a4e56d79jd176a31ajqp0re4am1dnvsna@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 13:23:52 -0500, "Sanna"
>> <sanna_onaneedtoknowbasisonly@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>SLGreg wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 10:46:54 -0700, "Cheri" <cherig3@newsguy.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "fmomoon" <fmomoon@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:4_OdnXvdu--DYMvRnZ2dnUVZ_rmdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "SLGreg" <SLGreg@daedsiPFB.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:81nd561fk6d4lg3ljr3kb5p4bai8m5b0hd@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 04:47:18 -0700 (PDT), "Tin@"
>>>>>>> <tinas49ers@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah, that's why they were there for 6 months while I was there.
>>>>>>>> Tell yourself any lie you need to, since it was because you and
>>>>>>>> Greg showed up that people started baling.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> People emailed Bob threatening to leave if he didn't kick your ass
>>>>>>> to the curb. C'ya, wouldn't wanna b'ya. Buh-bye.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dont believe anyone asked YOU. I had a hand in who was admitted
>>>>>>>> and Blob using you and Greg was part of what took down the group.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh please. Calling Dr. Ryan. We got another lying, pathological
>>>>>>> narcissist, with a heaping side of delusional grandeur on board
>>>>>>> here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bob let you THINK you had a say. If you did, why was *I* allowed to
>>>>>>> join, since you were so all powerful (before you were tossed out on
>>>>>>> your ass)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you're referring to that ridiculous email you sent to me,
>>>>>>> asking me to "sway your opinion," like you were some fictional
>>>>>>> "board member," I laughed out loud when I read it and told Bob
>>>>>>> that me answering to Tina would happen when pigs flew. I was
>>>>>>> admitted the next day.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Suck it bitch. You lost. Big time.
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> greg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Greg, again a good point. I specifically asked Bob if Tina was in
>>>>>> any position of authority in BFP and, as she claimed at one time,
>>>>>> was one of two people to contact for acceptance into the group.
>>>>>> Bob said that "Tina is confused." I don't anyone would be crazy
>>>>>> enough to think that BFP wasn't Bob's group, alone. He was the
>>>>>> only one that had any say as to who was accepted. No one ever knew
>>>>>> who was even in the pipeline until Bob's welcome post. If I'm
>>>>>> wrong on that, I hope someone speaks up. --
>>>>>> Moni
>>>>>
>>>>> You're wrong, and Bob lied if he said that. Tin@ was in charge at
>>>>> times.
>>>>
>>>> Well, shiver me timbers! Last I heard, Vandar was VP.
>>>
>>>Second in charge? Is that a joke? Was this some sort of parody of the
>>>emperor Bob schtick that was a fkin joke or are you serious?
>>
>> First off, I like Vandar and am not dissing him, and secondly, yes,
>> Bob anointed him second in command, a week or two before the doors
>> shut.
>> --
>> greg
>
> I think it was a smart move, Greg. Vandar is liked by everyone. Most of
> the others would have had at least one naysayer.
> --
> Moni
>
> ANGUS DEI: To play with a divinely beefy tone
This is worse than watching Big Brother after Dark on Showtime!
|
|
| | Topic: Re: OT -- I'm ready |
|---|
| Re: OT -- I'm ready [message #2902] |
Sun, 08 August 2010 03:56 |
azurespirit
Messages: 43
Registered: April 2008 |
Member |
|
|
"Sanna" <sanna_onaneedtoknowbasisonly@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:i3741n02fq6@news6.newsguy.com...
> SLGreg wrote:
>> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 10:46:54 -0700, "Cheri" <cherig3@newsguy.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> "fmomoon" <fmomoon@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>> news:4_OdnXvdu--DYMvRnZ2dnUVZ_rmdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>>
>>>> "SLGreg" <SLGreg@daedsiPFB.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:81nd561fk6d4lg3ljr3kb5p4bai8m5b0hd@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 04:47:18 -0700 (PDT), "Tin@"
>>>>> <tinas49ers@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, that's why they were there for 6 months while I was there.
>>>>>> Tell yourself any lie you need to, since it was because you and
>>>>>> Greg showed up that people started baling.
>>>>>
>>>>> People emailed Bob threatening to leave if he didn't kick your ass
>>>>> to the curb. C'ya, wouldn't wanna b'ya. Buh-bye.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dont believe anyone asked YOU. I had a hand in who was admitted
>>>>>> and Blob using you and Greg was part of what took down the group.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh please. Calling Dr. Ryan. We got another lying, pathological
>>>>> narcissist, with a heaping side of delusional grandeur on board
>>>>> here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bob let you THINK you had a say. If you did, why was *I* allowed to
>>>>> join, since you were so all powerful (before you were tossed out on
>>>>> your ass)?
>>>>>
>>>>> If you're referring to that ridiculous email you sent to me,
>>>>> asking me to "sway your opinion," like you were some fictional
>>>>> "board member," I laughed out loud when I read it and told Bob
>>>>> that me answering to Tina would happen when pigs flew. I was
>>>>> admitted the next day.
>>>>>
>>>>> Suck it bitch. You lost. Big time.
>>>>> --
>>>>> greg
>>>>
>>>> Greg, again a good point. I specifically asked Bob if Tina was in
>>>> any position of authority in BFP and, as she claimed at one time,
>>>> was one of two people to contact for acceptance into the group.
>>>> Bob said that "Tina is confused." I don't anyone would be crazy
>>>> enough to think that BFP wasn't Bob's group, alone. He was the
>>>> only one that had any say as to who was accepted. No one ever knew
>>>> who was even in the pipeline until Bob's welcome post. If I'm
>>>> wrong on that, I hope someone speaks up. --
>>>> Moni
>>>
>>> You're wrong, and Bob lied if he said that. Tin@ was in charge at
>>> times.
>>
>> Well, shiver me timbers! Last I heard, Vandar was VP.
>
> Second in charge? Is that a joke? Was this some sort of parody of the
> emperor Bob schtick that was a fkin joke or are you serious?
>
Is this sort of like the first runner-up in the Miss Universe pageant?
|
|
| | Topic: Re: OT: Back from hiatus (sort of) |
|---|
| Re: OT: Back from hiatus (sort of) [message #2823] |
Sat, 07 August 2010 00:05 |
dixichik
Messages: 16
Registered: May 2008 |
Junior Member |
|
|
On Aug 4, 8:38 am, Callen <callenmole...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Aug 3, 9:01 pm, dixichik <oneidacoll...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Well, after a looooonnnnngggg hiatus (not even lurking), I decided to
> > see what has been going on in my old stomping ground. From what I can
> > see, Tin@ is still around and being her usual self, Vandar is here and
> > apparently still a horndog (love it), greg and Moni are still here,
> > and Judy is also still here. I spotted Callen and some posts from
> > Sanna.
>
> > I didn't read everything because, quite frankly, most of it was boring
> > and still the same old stuff from certain people who shall remain
> > nameless. I did see a reference to a super-secret group and
> > apparently Bob started one somewhere.
>
> > I guess there has been a lot happening since I stepped out for a while
> > but I am going to try to keep coming back now and then. Hopefully,
> > I'll be able to meet up with old friends and possible make some new
> > ones.
>
> My posts are better than Sanna's, right?
>
> Welcome back, Dix!
>
> Callen in VA
Better than Sanna's? It depends on the day of the week and whether
either one of you is sober. <running>
|
|
| | Topic: Re: Proposal for ATAI after AI |
|---|
| Re: Proposal for ATAI after AI [message #2818] |
Fri, 06 August 2010 23:51 |
dixichik
Messages: 16
Registered: May 2008 |
Junior Member |
|
|
On Aug 4, 9:16 am, Xan <designsby...@gmail.com> wrote:
> dixichik wrote:
> > On Aug 2, 4:13 pm, "fmomoon" <fmom...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> I say we all just hang in here and morph over to X Factor. I suspect this
> >> may be the last season for AI, but I hope I'm wrong.
> >> --
> >> Moni
>
> >> ANGUS DEI: To play with a divinely beefy tone
>
> > I likee, Moni. Or we could morph to reality show addicts like
> > somebody else said. Project Runway and Hell's Kitchen for me.
>
> Me too, Dixi, plus Survivor and The Amazing Race! Oh, and we can't
> forget The Bachelor/Bachelorette for guilty pleasures! Aren't you glad
> Ali picked Roberto? Great love match! Hope it lasts.
>
> Xan
>
> Xan
Oh, Survivor. September 15 can't get here soon enough for me. My
hubby said it will be a great b-day present for him, LOL.
|
|
| | Topic: Re: OT-New Favorite ADS |
|---|
| | Topic: Re: SOTR - Clapton |
|---|
| | Topic: Re: Sanna |
|---|
| Re: Sanna [message #2730] |
Fri, 06 August 2010 03:55 |
azurespirit
Messages: 43
Registered: April 2008 |
Member |
|
|
"Bigolhomo" <nothing@nothing.com> wrote in message
news:1m7e56htbc1vlevu6ei89h982mdocp5plt@4ax.com...
> Exactly how long are we going to have to suffer through all this
> bullshit? This is the exact same pissing contest that's been going on
> for years in this group, what more could there possibly be left to
> say? Tina's a bitch, Bob is a liar, we get it already.
Have I ever told you how much I appreciate that you wrap things up in such a
neat, tidy package?
|
|
| | Topic: Re: Sanna |
|---|
| Re: Sanna [message #2729] |
Fri, 06 August 2010 03:46 |
azurespirit
Messages: 43
Registered: April 2008 |
Member |
|
|
"Callen" <callenmolenda@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:65711cd2-297a-4e08-a668-5411f77af679@f42g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 4, 8:34 pm, Susan <su...@nothanks.org> wrote:
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
>> On 8/4/2010 6:30 PM, Xan wrote:
>>
>> > Nor on mine.
>>
>> When someone behaves erratically, unpredictably, illogically and it's
>> clear that some sort of mood or other psychic crisis is going on, it's
>> about THEM, not about YOU. It's not uncommon for a person to suddenly
>> withdraw, cut ties without explanation in such cases.
>>
>> I don't know Fille, but I sure saw a serious episode on here, one that
>> let me know that one should expect exactly what you all describe, and
>> blaming her for how she made you feel is selfish and unkind.
>>
>> Sometimes we just have to accept that no matter how *we* behave, the
>> other person isn't always in a position to reciprocate nor to let us
>> know what me may mean to them or not.
>>
>> Other people's behavior is about them, not about us. If you can't accept
>> that, maybe you can at least not be so eager to pile oN, gangup and
>> assign blame and recriminations.
>>
>> From my perspective, and I only worked in mental health for 13 years so
>> take it or leave it, some restraint is appropriate here.
>>
>> Just sayinzall.
>>
>> Susan
>
> Susan, I think those who are discussing this are just clarifying that
> there is more to the story than what Fille wrote in her post attacking
> Greg. I do think most of the people who were placed in this position
> realize the seriousness of what they are dealing with which is why
> there was no discussion until now. Fille opened that door herself.
>
> Callen in VA
Allrightythen, I definitely have missed vast portions of this saga. Maybe
this group needs a giant "reset" button.
|
|
| | Topic: Re: Sanna |
|---|
| Re: Sanna [message #2728] |
Fri, 06 August 2010 03:34 |
azurespirit
Messages: 43
Registered: April 2008 |
Member |
|
|
"Fille" <filledepaix3@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e92d65b6-017c-4dbf-99db-475477706474@d17g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 3, 3:44 pm, "bella" <tinydan...@biteme.com> wrote:
>> "Vandar" <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:xqZ5o.53$st2.48@newsfe09.iad...
>>
>> > Ryan wrote:
>>
>> >> Someone needs to get some therapy and work on their self esteem. If
>> >> someone alllows an anonymous Usenet poster to have that kind of
>> >> control over their emotional well being, they are in trouble.
>>
>> > Someone missed the part about them being friends and speaking "off the
>> > group".
>>
>> >> Fille needs to work on her own issues and stop blaming others for
>> >> causing her emotional pain.
>>
>> > Ryan to needs to pay better attention to what is said before he vomits
>> > his
>> > pseudo psycho babble bullshit all over his keyboard.
>>
>> I agree. Thank you for saying it the best vandar.
>>
>> bella
>
>
> Thank you to both of you from me. I know who REALLY counts.
Glad to see you back, Fille. I've tried to e-mail you...to no avail.
(I'm also over 1,000 posts behind now, so I hope you're still here!)
|
|
| | Topic: Re: Sanna |
|---|
| Re: Sanna [message #2727] |
Fri, 06 August 2010 03:30 |
azurespirit
Messages: 43
Registered: April 2008 |
Member |
|
|
"fmomoon" <fmomoon@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:ouudnVDyrev8JMXRnZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>
> "Judy Haffner" <jhaffner@webtv.net> wrote in message
> news:8314-4C58AC5A-650@storefull-3252.bay.webtv.net...
>>
>>>LOVE your new sig!
>>
>> Not sure now if this NG has been invaded by aliens, or what, but I did
>> NOT send, or write the above post, and yet it shows that it came from me
>> just a short time ago?! I haven't posted here this this morning...am
>> just now speed reading and trying to catch up on all the posts from this
>> afternoon! :-O
>>
>> Judy
>>
>
> I know, Judy. I realized we had been infested after I posted. Sorry.
> Darn those gnats!
> --
> Moni
>
> ANGUS DEI: To play with a divinely beefy tone
Shall I call Orkin?
|
|
| | Topic: Re: Kara DioGuardi Fired from 'American Idol,' Report Says |
|---|
| Re: Kara DioGuardi Fired from 'American Idol,' Report Says [message #2709] |
Thu, 05 August 2010 23:53 |
tzigaane
Messages: 12
Registered: June 2008 |
Junior Member |
|
|
fmomoon wrote:
>
> "TheChris" <cabell64@nospam.gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9DCAA0D455DB821740@85.214.73.210...
>> SLGreg <SLGreg@daedsiPFB.com> wrote in
>> news:j6p6565rk17c4cqo24fmbs1hsp5dq95d42@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:45:45 -0700 (PDT), The_LA_Flash
>>> <Phil3487@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jul 30, 7:37 am, Itoshi <ito...@no.spam.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:01:18 -0700 (PDT), Sandi
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >Yeah, now if they would get rid of Randy, who offers absolutely
>>>>> >nothing constructive, we might get somewhere!
>>>>>
>>>>> Randy's schtick is lame, but despite that, he has been the only judge
>>>>> who consistently *does* offer constructive singing advice. Ignore the
>>>>> catch-phrases and fluff and listen to what they actually say, and
>>>>> you'll see.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe so; I know he sure says "pitchy" a lot and I've been watching
>>>> A.I. since season 1 and in all of those years I've never heard anyone
>>>> explain what pitchy is?
>>>
>>> It's what musically illiterate people say when they are incapable of
>>> differentiating sharp from flat.
>>> --
>>> greg
>>>
>>
>> That's not entirely true.. If somebody was always sharp, or always flat,
>> you'd say that. If somebody wavers, that's pitchy.
>
> I usually just say "off pitch" when it fluctuates.
Yeah! *Pitchy*!
tzigaane
|
|
| | Topic: Re: Sanna |
|---|
| Re: Sanna [message #2595] |
Thu, 05 August 2010 16:43 |
Scarlett
Messages: 52
Registered: August 2010 |
Member |
|
|
"Micki" <mostmde@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:l6jl56t1v6t9cmjekb19j2qe2n3v03fcru@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:48:01 -0400, Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Susan wrote:
>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>
>>> On 8/4/2010 6:30 PM, Xan wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nor on mine.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> When someone behaves erratically, unpredictably, illogically and it's
>>> clear that some sort of mood or other psychic crisis is going on, it's
>>> about THEM, not about YOU. It's not uncommon for a person to suddenly
>>> withdraw, cut ties without explanation in such cases.
>>>
>>> I don't know Fille, but I sure saw a serious episode on here, one that
>>> let me know that one should expect exactly what you all describe, and
>>> blaming her for how she made you feel is selfish and unkind.
>>>
>>> Sometimes we just have to accept that no matter how *we* behave, the
>>> other person isn't always in a position to reciprocate nor to let us
>>> know what me may mean to them or not.
>>>
>>> Other people's behavior is about them, not about us. If you can't accept
>>> that, maybe you can at least not be so eager to pile oN, gangup and
>>> assign blame and recriminations.
>>>
>>> From my perspective, and I only worked in mental health for 13 years so
>>> take it or leave it, some restraint is appropriate here.
>>
>>Holy shit on a stick! I agree with Susan.
>
> Yup. I'm sitting here with my mouth open because I agree 100% with
> her too. And yes, I too was also "defriended" several times but
> understood without needing it explained and was happy to reconnect.
>
> Micki
> " We know when we know, and if we knew then what we know now, we would
> have."
And would you also be happy to sit here holding your tongue while she flings
insults at her "former friends", then throws a great big ol' hissy fit,
calling names and absolutely vilifying you, accusing you of not anything
that YOU did, but accusing YOU of doing everything that SHE did?
Sorry, I'm not known for holding my tongue, I just call a spade a spade.
I'm not responsible for her mental health. She is a grown up 50-something
age woman who is not new to her condition. She KNOWS what she should be
doing, and not.
We didn't strike first, we didn't strike back, we just finally opened up
after being slapped repeatedly, then hit with a brick. If you don't like it
or don't agree, that's your problem.
--
Scarlett
If you met my family you would understand!
|
|
| | Topic: Re: Sanna |
|---|
| Re: Sanna [message #2593] |
Thu, 05 August 2010 16:35 |
Scarlett
Messages: 52
Registered: August 2010 |
Member |
|
|
"Susan" <susan@nothanks.org> wrote in message
news:8c002vFsvpU5@mid.individual.net...
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> On 8/4/2010 10:41 PM, Scarlett wrote:
>
>> Well Susan, much restraint has been used here. You have no idea how
>> much.
>> This emotional vampire has put us all through the ringer over and over
>> and
>> over again. Then come in here and blame OTHER people for doing that to
>> her?
>> Sorry hon, it's a flat out lie. You were not there, you don't know.
>>
>> We are all well aware of Chris' issues. Did you not notice how so many
>> people said they gave her love and support? Can you imagine, knowing her
>> condition, seeing her spinning out of control, and then just
>> disappearing?
>> We had no way to know if she was alive or dead, seriously. After about 3
>> rounds of this, each time with her coming back like nothing went wrong,
>> folks get just a little bit spent, yanno? Now she comes along and
>> attempts
>> to paint her former friends as having done something to her? That is
>> just
>> wrong in my book. YMMV.
>
> WHOOOOOOSSHHHHHHHHHHH!
>
> Susan
Yes, I'm not surprised that any of this goes right over your head. But
since you love, and cannot resist, having the last word, to the point of
being known as "last word Susan", this one's for you baby:
LAST WORD
Happy now?
--
Scarlett
If you met my family you would understand!
|
|
| | Topic: Re: OT: California Gay Marriage ban OVERTURNED ! |
|---|
| Re: OT: California Gay Marriage ban OVERTURNED ! [message #2572] |
Thu, 05 August 2010 15:17 |
tinas49ers
Messages: 186
Registered: April 2008 |
Senior Member |
|
|
On Aug 5, 7:53 am, Hoverman <hoverman1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 5, 10:41 am, "briansataiem...@gmail.com"
>
>
>
>
>
> <briansatailem...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 22:14:04 -0700, Salad wrote:
> > > briansataiem...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > >> On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 16:07:01 -0700, Starbuck wrote:
>
> > >>> http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2010/08/04/judges _ruling_r...
>
> > >>>Judge overturns Calif. gay marriage ban
>
> > >>> SAN FRANCISCO
>
> > >> It was only a matter of time. The libs found one of their own in a
> > >> black robe sympathetic to their cause, himself gay. Imagine if this judge
> > >> had voted the other way. He'd have never gotten laid again! Now of
> > >> course, the liberal media has done a very nice job of concealing this
> > >> little secret recently, while earlier they took the position that it was a
> > >> non-issue. LOL, yea ok. But, alas, it's nothing we haven't seen happen
> > >> before, anyhow. Was it Nebraska circa 2006 when a federal judge last
> > >> mistakenly ruled that the US Constitution contained a gay marriage clause
> > >> and was promptly set straight by the court of appeals? So this, again, is
> > >> also just a matter of time. And what the libs can't seem to fathom is
> > >> that this hinders, rather than helps their cause. Let it go to the 9th
> > >> Circus, where it will probably be upheld before ultimately faltering 5-4
> > >> at the SCOTUS level. And then this nonsense can be put to rest for good,
> > >> and we can finally put this distraction behind us and move on to the
> > >> really pressing issues our country is facing.
>
> > > And another anti-American anti-equality bigot spews his crap. After I
> > > listened to analysis of this on TV and radio it is a wonder that this
> > > bigoted proposition ever got on the CA ballot.
>
> > That's because what you thought was an analysis was actually propaganda..
> > Nevermind that ~90% of the black Californians who voted for Obama
> > also voted for Prop 8. They are, OF COURSE, bigots. Nevermind that ~70%
> > of the Mexican Californians who voted for Obama also voted for Prop 8.
> > They, too, are definitely bigots.
>
> > Call it what you want. Keep watering down the term 'bigotry' to your
> > heart's content. After all that, it is still an unjustified ruling by a
> > biased gay judge that will not ultimately pass constitutional muster.
> > Don't like it? Change the US Constitution to include a same sex marriage
> > clause.
>
> In your opinion, why should Gay people be treated differently than all
> other people? Is it because of their sexual practices? Where are the
> ammendments to the Constitution allowing Black people to marry each
> other? Or use the same water fountains as white people? Bigotry is
> "irrational suspicion or hatred of a particular group, race, or
> religion". How is denying same-sex marriage NOT bigotry?-
Nobody hates anyone, it's just lies idiots like you tell.
|
|
| | Topic: Re: OT -- I'm ready |
|---|
| Re: OT -- I'm ready [message #2566] |
Thu, 05 August 2010 15:01 |
Scarlett
Messages: 52
Registered: August 2010 |
Member |
|
|
"bella" <tinydancer@biteme.com> wrote in message
news:i3deo8$tsi$1@news.albasani.net...
>
> "Scarlett" <mmmilady@NOSPAMsbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:i3de2u$stj$1@news.albasani.net...
>> "bella" <tinydancer@biteme.com> wrote in message
>> news:i3dbpl$psn$1@news.albasani.net...
>>>
>>> "Scarlett" <mmmilady@NOSPAMsbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>> news:i3d6s9$k28$1@news.albasani.net...
>>>> "bella" <tinydancer@biteme.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:i3cu1c$80c$1@news.albasani.net...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Xan" <designsbyxan@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:i3bt87$kc3$2@news.albasani.net...
>>>>>> bella wrote:
>>>>>>> "Xan" <designsbyxan@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:i3arii$vbf$3@news.albasani.net...
>>>>>>>> fmomoon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Xan" <designsbyxan@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:i39rf7$k7r$2@news.albasani.net...
>>>>>>>>>> My idea of "roughing it" is not having room service.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Xan
>>>>>>>>> Well said and I couldn't agree more. I have camped and I don't
>>>>>>>>> see that happening again intentionally. :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've camped as well, and it was a fun experience, but it got so
>>>>>>>> boring at times that I just wanted to be back home. We are
>>>>>>>> planning a camping trip soon, though, because I'm doing a craft
>>>>>>>> show at a nearby lake and campground. It's a two-day event, so
>>>>>>>> we're going to camp overnight.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Xan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In a tent? Or do you have a camper? I really need AC down here.
>>>>>>> What area are you in Xan? Is it really hot where you are?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> bella
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In a tent. I live in IL on the east side of the Mississippi about 20
>>>>>> miles from St. Louis. This summer has been excruciatingly hot and
>>>>>> humid (yesterday being the hottest day of the year at 100 with a heat
>>>>>> index of 111-112), but the craft fair is in September, so we're
>>>>>> hoping for it to be cooler than it is now. Hoping...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Xan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I love the Mississippi, always dreamed of perhaps retiring on a bluff
>>>>> above the river somewhere around Red Wing or Winonna Minnesota. I
>>>>> sympathize with you, have other friends who live in St. Louis and they
>>>>> too have talked about the oppressive heat and humidity this summer. I
>>>>> hope it does cool off for you come September. Down here it's
>>>>> *usually* well into October before we can shut off the AC. I'll keep
>>>>> my fingers crossed for you.......
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> bella
>>>>
>>>> Well meanwhile here in Chicago it, too, has been hotter than a
>>>> firecracker! But that's okay, in a few... um... weeks? we will be ass
>>>> high in snow and 16 below! Dear God help me. If I ever get back to
>>>> Georgia, I'm gonna nail my feet to the ground! (Props to Lewis
>>>> Grizzard for that line. He gave one of his books that title while
>>>> living in Chicago, good Georgia boy, and Great American that he was!)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Scarlett
>>>> If you met my family you would understand!
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ms. Scarlett, you should be taking advantage of that weather. I love
>>> fake fur ( you know, my love of animals and all ), coats. I have about
>>> four really nice fake fur coats that I NEVER get to wear down here.
>>> :( Like maybe once a winter I might get to wear ONE of the coats.
>>> Cool boots, nope, I used to have a gorgeous white fur hat, loved it. I
>>> can just see you strutting around in fur lined boots, cozy fur coat,
>>> cool fur hat. I am so envious. :( I love winter clothes.
>>>
>>>
>>> ms bella
>>
>> Oh I love my Ugg boots! I could wear them year round. And I have a
>> beautiful fake fur coat that is just yummy! But I'm so Southern that I
>> would totally rock that even if I lived in Florida! :-)
>>
>> I wish I had a fur hat. My coat has a hood, but it isn't the same. When
>> my daughter was little she had one of those white fur hats with the ties
>> with fur balls on the ends, and the matching white fur muff. So cute!
>>
>> --
>> Scarlett
>
>
>
> My white fur hat was very similar to the one in that scene of Dr. Zhivago.
> You should be able to find one in Chicago, no? I tell you, since I had
> the hysterectomy, I am like a furnace. HOT all the time. I keep our
> thermostat set on 60 degrees all winter here. And I still don't get to
> wear my sweaters or turtlenecks. I just get so warm in them. Last winter
> it was cold and windy one day, so we started out of here and I wore one of
> my fur coats. By the time we got to the end of our road, we had to turn
> around and come back home so hubby could take my heavy coat inside and
> grab me one of my fleece coats cause I was just boiling already. :( I
> have pink Uggs, wore them the winter before last when we had a real
> blizzard down here! I leashed up the dogs, and we went walking in that
> blowing snow, had such a good time. Smiling just remembering it. Man, if
> only we could trade places, 'eh? We always said 'once dh retired, we'd be
> outta here' and then we had grandchildren. shot that plan all to hell.
>
>
> bella
Well, all of my grandbabies are in Georgia, so that's the plan for us! We
would have to move anyway, all of these stairs are just too much for me. So
I'm hanging in there until we can go home. Next house... all one level!
--
Scarlett
If you met my family you would understand!
|
|
| | Topic: Re: OT-New Favorite ADS |
|---|
| Re: OT-New Favorite ADS [message #2562] |
Thu, 05 August 2010 14:19 |
tzigaane
Messages: 12
Registered: June 2008 |
Junior Member |
|
|
azurespirit wrote:
> I love, Love, LOVE the DirecTV ad that looks like a Russian mafia guy
> with all sorts of gilt furniture and hot models. I think I half paid
> attention to it about ten times and pretty much ignored it until I
> finally watched and saw the tiny giraffe sitting on the pillow at the
> end. It cracks me up every time. I HAVE to stop and watch it.
>
> OK....this is the best part of the ad. I love the comments!
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVxxLYmypv8
>
>
> My other new favorite ad is the Target ad with the "Free to Be, You and
> Me" music and the triplet girls. I swear I replayed it about five times
> in a row the first night I saw it. I had flashbacks to my first year or
> two of teaching.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwy2ByNp_CE
>
> Good comments here as well. Target is moving back to its rightful place
> as one of the kings of TV ads.
>
> ....OK, now I have the urge to buy this DVD. I'm getting flashbacks of
> my first year of teaching.
>
>
>
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_26FOHoaC78&feature=relat ed
>
> I still think it's awesome. Mr. Azure would like it because he always
> had a bit of the hots for Marlo.
>
>
This isn't a new favorite, it's pretty old (does
Volkswagen even make the Carbriolet anymore?)
Came out in the days before YouTube and I had to
do some investigating to find out that it was Pink
Moon by Nick Drake.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIOW9fLT9eY
And that of course leads to another Nick Drake
song in an ad:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QddkHo1X5qY
Old songs. He died in 1974 I believe. They never
new for sure whether it was an accidental drug
overdose (presecription anti-depressants or
something) or a suicide. Tragically sad either way.
tzigaane
|
|
| | Topic: OT: Dog Food Recall |
|---|
| OT: Dog Food Recall [message #2561] |
Thu, 05 August 2010 14:18 |
Micki Epstein
Messages: 18
Registered: April 2008 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Have you all seen this? Just a heads up.
P&G Expands Voluntary Limited Recall of Specialized Dry Pet Foods
Due to Possible Health Risk
CINCINNATI, July 30, 2010 - The Procter & Gamble Company
(P&G) (NYSE:PG) is voluntarily expanding its recall to include
veterinary and some specialized dry pet food as a precautionary
measure because it has the potential to be contaminated with
salmonella. No salmonella-related illnesses have been reported.
The following products are included:
Product Name
Version
"Best-By" Dates
UPC Code
Iams Veterinary Dry Formulas
All dry sizes and varieties
01Jul10 - 01Dec11
All UPC Codes
Eukanuba Naturally Wild
All dry sizes and varieties
01Jul10 - 01Dec11
All UPC Codes
Eukanuba Pure
All dry sizes and varieties
01Jul10 - 01Dec11
All UPC Codes
Eukanuba Custom Care Sensitive Skin
All dry sizes
01Jul10 - 01Dec11
All UPC Codes
The affected products are sold in veterinary clinics and
specialty pet retailers throughout the United States and Canada. No
canned food, biscuits/treats or supplements are affected by this
announcement. A full listing of UPC codes can be found at
www.iams.com
These products are made in a single, specialized facility. In
cooperation with FDA, P&G determined that some products made at this
facility have the potential for salmonella contamination. As a
precautionary measure, P&G is recalling all products made at this
facility.
Consumers who have purchased the specific dry pet foods
listed should discard them. People handling dry pet food can become
infected with Salmonella, especially if they have not thoroughly
washed their hands after having contact with surfaces exposed to this
product. Healthy people infected with Salmonella should monitor
themselves for some or all of the following symptoms: nausea,
vomiting, diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping and fever.
Rarely, Salmonella can result in more serious ailments including
arterial infections, endocarditis, arthritis, muscle pain, eye
irritation and urinary tract symptoms. Consumers exhibiting these
signs after having contact with this product should contact their
healthcare providers.
Pets with Salmonella infections may have decreased appetite,
fever and abdominal pain. If left untreated, pets may be lethargic
and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever and vomiting. Infected
but otherwise healthy pets can be carriers and infect other animals or
humans. If your pet has consumed the recalled product and has these
symptoms, please contact your veterinarian.
For further information or a product refund call P&G
toll-free at 877-340-8823
(Monday - Friday, 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM EST).
# # #
About Procter & Gamble
Four billion times a day, P&G brands touch the lives of people around
the world. The company has one of the strongest portfolios of trusted,
quality, leadership brands, including Pampersr, Tider, Arielr,
Alwaysr, Whisperr, Pantener, Mach3r, Bountyr, Dawnr, Gainr, Pringlesr,
Charminr, Downyr, Lenorr, Iamsr, Crestr, Oral-Br, Duracellr, Olayr,
Head & Shouldersr, Wellar, Gilletter, Braunr, and Fusionr. The P&G
community includes approximately 135,000 employees working in about 80
countries worldwide. Please visit http://www.pg.com for the latest
news and in-depth information about P&G and its brands.
Media Contact: Jason Taylor 513-622-3205
UPC CODES FOR P&G PET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS RECALLED ON JULY 30, 2010
EUKANUBA DOG BG PURE
Item UPC
PURE TURKEY *
4 LB
0 19014 03191 7
PURE ADULT MAINTENANCE *
4.5 LB
0 19014 03958 6
PURE PUPPY GROWTH *
4.5 LB
0 19014 03949 4
PURE ADULT MAINTENANCE *
15 LB
0 19014 03953 1
PURE ADULT LARGE BRD *
15 LB
0 19014 03959 3
PURE PUPPY GROWTH *
15 LB
0 19014 03955 5
PURE TURKEY *
15 LB
0 19014 03192 4
PURE ADULT MAINTENANCE *
30 LB
0 19014 03952 4
PURE ADULT LARGE BRD *
30 LB
0 19014 03960 9
PURE PUPPY GROWTH *
30 LB
0 19014 09364 7
PURE TURKEY *
30 LB
0 19014 03193 1
EUKANUBA DOG CUSTOM CARE
CUSTOM CARE - SENSITIVE SKIN
5.5 LB
0 19014 01935 9
CUSTOM CARE - SENSITIVE SKIN
28 LB
0 19014 01936 6
EUKANUBA DOG DRY NATURALY WILD
ADULT SALMON & RICE
4 LB
0 19014 02780 4
ADULT TURKEY & MULTIGRAIN
4 LB
0 19014 02776 7
ADULT VENISON & POTATO
4 LB
0 19014 02783 5
ADULT SALMON & RICE*
9.5 LB
0 19014 02894 8
ADULT TURKEY & MULTIGRAIN*
9.5 LB
0 19014 02895 5
ADULT VENISON & POTATO*
9.5 LB
0 19014 02893 1
ADULT SALMON & RICE
15 LB
0 19014 02781 1
ADULT TURKEY & MULTIGRAIN
15 LB
0 19014 02778 1
ADULT VENISON & POTATO
15 LB
0 19014 02784 2
ADULT SALMON & RICE *
19 LB
0 19014 02897 9
ADULTTURKEY & MULTIGRAIN *
19 LB
0 19104 02898 6
ADULT VENISON & POTATO *
19 LB
019104 02896 2
ADULT SALMON & RICE
30 LB
0 19014 02782 8
ADULT TURKEY & MULTIGRAIN
30 LB
0 19014 02779 8
ADULT VENISON & POTATO
30 LB
0 19014 02785 9
All NATURALLY WILD SAMPLES
7 oz.
IAMS VETERINARY FORMULA CAT DRY BAG
WEIGHT LOSS RESTRICTED CALORIE
2 KG
0 19014 13720 6
INTESTINAL - LOW RESIDUE
5.5 LB
0 19014 15210 0
OPTIMUM WEIGHT CONTROL D
5.5 LB
0 19014 21305 4
RENAL MULTI-STAGE
5.5 LB
0 19014 21405 1
URINARY 0 - MODERATE PH/O
5.5 LB
0 19014 15510 1
URINARY S - LOW PH/S
5.5 LB
0 19014 14210 1
INTESTINAL - LOW RESIDUE
14 LB
0 19014 00859 9
WEIGHT LOSS RESTRICTED CALORIE
18 LB
0 19014 02236 6
URINARY S - LOW PH/S
20 LB
0 19014 14221 7
IAMS VETERINARY FORMULA DOG DRY BAG
INTESTINAL - LOW RESIDUE
5 LB
0 19014 12405 3
OPTIMUM WEIGHT CONTROL D
5 LB
0 19014 15105 9
WEIGHT LOSS RESTRICTED CALORIE
5 LB
0 19014 12205 9
RENAL EARLY STAGE
5.5 LB
0 19014 14410 5
JOINT
6 LB
0 19014 21006 0
SKIN & COAT RESPONSE FP
6 LB
0 19014 12106 9
SKIN & COAT RESPONSE KO
6 LB
0 19014 21106 7
PUPPY INTESTINAL LOW RESIDUE
8 LB
0 19014 12908 9
WEIGHT LOSS RESTRICTED CALORIE
14 LB
0 19014 12214 1
JOINT
15 LB
0 19014 21015 2
OPTIMUM WEIGHT CONTROL D
15 LB
0 19014 15115 8
SKIN & COAT RESPONSE FP
15 LB
0 19014 12115 1
SKIN & COAT RESPONSE KO
15 LB
0 19014 21115 9
INTESTINAL - LOW RESIDUE
15 LB
0 19014 12415 2
" We know when we know, and if we knew then what we know now, we would have."
|
|
| | Topic: Re: OT: California Gay Marriage ban OVERTURNED ! |
|---|
| Re: OT: California Gay Marriage ban OVERTURNED ! [message #2557] |
Thu, 05 August 2010 13:16 |
Salad
Messages: 52
Registered: June 2008 |
Member |
|
|
fmomoon wrote:
>
> "Salad" <salad@oilandvinegar.com> wrote in message
> news:Rf-dnYRZwvgA1cfRnZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d@earthlink.com...
>
>> briansataiemail@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 16:07:01 -0700, Starbuck wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2010/08/04/judges _ruling_ready_in_calif_gay_marriage_case/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Judge overturns Calif. gay marriage ban
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> SAN FRANCISCO
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It was only a matter of time. The libs found one of their own in a
>>> black robe sympathetic to their cause, himself gay. Imagine if this
>>> judge
>>> had voted the other way. He'd have never gotten laid again! Now of
>>> course, the liberal media has done a very nice job of concealing this
>>> little secret recently, while earlier they took the position that it
>>> was a
>>> non-issue. LOL, yea ok. But, alas, it's nothing we haven't seen happen
>>> before, anyhow. Was it Nebraska circa 2006 when a federal judge last
>>> mistakenly ruled that the US Constitution contained a gay marriage
>>> clause
>>> and was promptly set straight by the court of appeals? So this,
>>> again, is
>>> also just a matter of time. And what the libs can't seem to fathom is
>>> that this hinders, rather than helps their cause. Let it go to the 9th
>>> Circus, where it will probably be upheld before ultimately faltering 5-4
>>> at the SCOTUS level. And then this nonsense can be put to rest for
>>> good,
>>> and we can finally put this distraction behind us and move on to the
>>> really pressing issues our country is facing.
>>
>>
>> And another anti-American anti-equality bigot spews his crap. After
>> I listened to analysis of this on TV and radio it is a wonder that
>> this bigoted proposition ever got on the CA ballot.
>>
> It was for a very logical reason, Salad. More money and lots of people,
> many of whom were Californians, pushed it. As I said, discussion is
> good. Both sides must be heard or this is a dictatorship, which is not
> what I envision this country to be. This issue is not going away,
> anymore than that ancient issue of Civil Rights is going away.
You might be right. In order to push America towards equality oerhaps
it needed Prop 8. The arguments for its overturn are stronger that some
religious opinions. America is not a theocracy yet.
|
|
| | Topic: Re: OT: California Gay Marriage ban OVERTURNED ! |
|---|
| Re: OT: California Gay Marriage ban OVERTURNED ! [message #2553] |
Thu, 05 August 2010 13:09 |
Salad
Messages: 52
Registered: June 2008 |
Member |
|
|
briansataiemail@gmail.com wrote:
>>And another anti-American anti-equality bigot spews his crap. After I
>>listened to analysis of this on TV and radio it is a wonder that this
>>bigoted proposition ever got on the CA ballot.
>
>
> That's because what you thought was an analysis was actually propaganda.
> Nevermind that ~90% of the black Californians who voted for Obama
> also voted for Prop 8.
A diversion you mention that means nothing, anti-American boy.
They are, OF COURSE, bigots. Nevermind that ~70%
> of the Mexican Californians who voted for Obama also voted for Prop 8.
> They, too, are definitely bigots.
A diversion you mention that means nothing, anti-American boy.
> Call it what you want. Keep watering down the term 'bigotry' to your
> heart's content. After all that, it is still an unjustified ruling by a
> biased gay judge that will not ultimately pass constitutional muster.
> Don't like it? Change the US Constitution to include a same sex marriage
> clause.
>
In your opinion, bigot boy. However, if you need to change the
constitution, which right wingers think might be a good document if
changed to suit their lifestyle, you go and change it. I'm satisfied
with it. You got a problem with it, move to another state like Wyoming
or Utah where you can get the support you need.
If it was on the balot that interracial marriages would be illegal you'd
be in the forefront voting approval.
If it was on the balot that a black man and black woman's marriage would
not be recognized (like it was done way back when) you'd be in the
forefront voting approval.
If your sexual gender attraction is in doubt and that causes you angst
then see a therapist.
If you are against equality you and millions of others can express that
sentiment. It doesn't make it law. This is America, anti-American
bigot boy.
|
|
| | Topic: Re: OT: California Gay Marriage ban OVERTURNED ! |
|---|
| Re: OT: California Gay Marriage ban OVERTURNED ! [message #2549] |
Thu, 05 August 2010 13:07 |
fmomoon
Messages: 76
Registered: June 2008 |
Member |
|
|
"Micki" <mostmde@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:lrpl56566djgu9fopos2am6t29o8dil4e7@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:27:08 -0400, Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>SLGreg wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:01:59 -0400, Susan <susan@nothanks.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>x-no-archive: yes
>>>>
>>>>On 8/5/2010 10:55 AM, Micki wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>And my totally dysfunctional New York State Senate keeps holding the
>>>>>state from passing a gay marriage act.
>>>>
>>>>It's the shame of NY.
>>>>
>>>>Susan
>>>
>>>
>>> I thought that was Brooklyn?!
>>>
>>> <duck/run/hide>
>>
>>As a New Yorker, I refuse to disagree with that statement. :-)
>
> Nope. It's Staten Island.
You guys crack me up.
--
Moni
ANGUS DEI: To play with a divinely beefy tone
|
|
| | Topic: Re: PING: Micki, Bella, Etc. |
|---|
| Re: PING: Micki, Bella, Etc. [message #2548] |
Thu, 05 August 2010 13:05 |
fmomoon
Messages: 76
Registered: June 2008 |
Member |
|
|
"Micki" <mostmde@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:4kml56t0288084nppo01cqdkc6bgc4kcj9@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 09:13:40 -0800, jhaffner@webtv.net (Judy Haffner)
> wrote:
>
>>
>>Micki wrote:
>>
>>>My problem is I don't have a laptop.
>>> Wish I did.
>>
>>Gee, Micki! Sure sorry to hear you fell and banged up your poor knee. I
>>know all about sore knees, as I have two that give me fits at times. I
>>didn't fall, but have arthritis in both, and they will swell and start
>>"yelling" at me! :-(
>>
>>I don't have a laptop either, but I have a wireless keyboard/mouse and
>>have a lap desk I put the keyboard on, when I sit on my comfy couch and
>>do E-mail.
>>
>>Are you taking anything for the pain and swelling? Aleve works for me,
>>but hubby says it doesn't help with his aches 'n' pains, but then his is
>>a whole other matter, as he was attacked by a 800 lb. brown bear sow,
>>and had one knee ripped completely off 36 years ago. That one was
>>replaced....twice, and the other, he had a total knee replacement done
>>on it once.
>>
>>Judy
>
> Wholly sh-t!!! I skipped ahead and read your husband's story but wow!
> I am not going to complain about my knee (at least not for an hour;)
> after reading that.
>
> I have been taking Ibuprofen but it and Aleve aren't supposed to be
> taken with my blood pressure med (an NSAID). My doctor (who is now on
> vacation) has said it is okay except not to take "too much". I'm also
> beginning to think that it may not have been the "fall" which wasn't
> really a fall but trying to save myself from a misstep as it didn't
> hurt until the next day and it is swollen under the knee. I just hate
> not being mobile so I am not resting with my leg up and icing as I
> should.
>
> Micki
> " We know when we know, and if we knew then what we know now, we would
> have."
I know it's frustrating to stay still, Micki. Listen to your doctor,
though, and take care of yourself. Behave. :)
--
Moni
ANGUS DEI: To play with a divinely beefy tone
|
|
| | Topic: Re: OT: A fun(?) musical thread |
|---|
| Re: OT: A fun(?) musical thread [message #2547] |
Sat, 20 September 2008 14:59 |
topcat
Messages: 279
Registered: March 2008 |
Senior Member |
|
|
"fmomoon" <fmomoon@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:4bSdndEz7c7M2EjVnZ2dnUVZ_hadnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> "topcat" <topcat@aboy.com> wrote in message
> news:Et6dnSaYu9Ds3UjVnZ2dnUVZ_gudnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> "fmomoon" <fmomoon@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:oc6dncqgWaShoUjVnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> "topcat" <topcat@aboy.com> wrote in message
>>> news:15WdnYNMI99HvkjVnZ2dnUVZ_sjinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>
>>>> "fmomoon" <fmomoon@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:_uOdnU7qk_rOwEnVnZ2dnUVZ_vCdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>> "topcat" <topcat@aboy.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:AZmdnbH8o6CW1knVnZ2dnUVZ_orinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>> "Sanna" <sanna_onaneedtoknowbasisonly@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:gb1hmr026qf@news7.newsguy.com...
>>>>>>> topcat wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Sanna" <sanna_onaneedtoknowbasisonly@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:gb1d6q028to@news5.newsguy.com...
>>>>>>>>> topcat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "Sanna" <sanna_onaneedtoknowbasisonly@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:gb1ack026ig@news5.newsguy.com...
>>>>>>>>>>> topcat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Vandar" <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:%YPAk.14070$5v6.10151@fe105.usenetserver.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dixichik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 19, 10:08 am, SLGreg <SLG...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:05:41 -0700 (PDT), dixichik
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <oneidacoll...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 19, 10:03 am, SLGreg <SLG...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:58:36 -0700 (PDT), dixichik
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <oneidacoll...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 19, 7:14 am, fille <filledep...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 19, 1:06 pm, "topcat" <top...@aboy.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "fmomoon" <fmom...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:R-ydnZTek90epk7VnZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Vandar" <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:kMGAk.1378$QC1.337@fe109.usenetserver.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fmomoon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Rocky" <no...@nothere.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:Xns9B1DD8F6F229Dnotmenothere@208.49.80.60...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fille <filledep...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:bace6127-346c-4708-b0e9-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4efaaf96e...@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The object of this thread is to communicate with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other using only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> titles of songs. It might require us to think a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little, have a few
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> laffs, and get our minds off of the political
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if only for a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So on that note..................."Send In The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clowns":...........................
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Here We Are"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Where Do We Go From Here?"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Over The Hills And Far Away"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "The Long and Winding Road."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm "One Step Closer" (Listen, it's good!!)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "To Where You Are"- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Somewhere Over The Rainbow"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "In The Mood"- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "U + Ur Hand Tonight"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Evil Woman" (don't play your games with me)- Hide quoted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> text
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "I Know What Boys Want"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Fat Bottomed Girls"?
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Shake Your Booty"
>>>>>>>>>>> "I'd like to check you for ticks"
>>>>>>>>>> "That's What I Like About You"
>>>>>>>>> "Cat scratch fever"
>>>>>>>> "Cream (Get On Top)" (Prince)
>>>>>>> "Desperado"
>>>>>> "Mama Told Me Not To Come"
>>>>> "Your Mama Don't Dance"
>>>> "Daddy's Home"
>>> "Daddy Won't You Please Come Home" (Shuffle Along by Eubie Blake)
>> "Who's Your Daddy" (Toby Keith
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMwzr7KzICE )
> "Who Needs a Father" (The Farmer Weds a Widow by Bierman)
>
"It's A Family Affair" (Sly and the Family Stone, I think)
TC
|
|
| | Topic: Re: OT/ Question About Political Discussions In NG? |
|---|
| Re: OT/ Question About Political Discussions In NG? [message #2545] |
Mon, 04 August 2008 09:26 |
daveparks
Messages: 146
Registered: April 2008 |
Senior Member |
|
|
On Aug 3, 12:51 pm, "Cure_Ewan" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Tin@" <tinas49...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:4ebd4780-72a1-4364-852e-aa242b0c86c1@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 3, 7:49 am, SLGreg <SLG...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 23:14:51 -0700 (PDT), "Tin@" <tinas49...@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > >On Aug 2, 10:45 pm, "Cure_Ewan" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >> "zob" <zob@ cox.net> wrote in message
>
> > >>news:dce294tp7eqt4d33qthi778ua261q81u95@4ax.com...
>
> > >> > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:15:36 -0700 (PDT), "Tin@"
> > >> > <tinas49...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >> >>I'm hostile because it doesn't take 2 brain cells to figure to stop
> > >> >>reading threads that bore you, yet she seems to think we need to hear
> > >> >>about what bores her, along with her regularly telling people how and
> > >> >>what to post. She's a control freak.
>
> > >> > Pot. Kettle. Black.
>
> > >> zob, that comparison is an insult to marijuana, cookware and people of
> > >> color
> > >> throughout the world. ;-P
>
> > >There's that sophomoric humor that makes us roll our eyes.
>
> > Speak for yourself. Actually, I thought it was kinda clever.
>
> > - greg-
>
> Thanks for admitting you have sophomoric humor. I'm sure you laugh at
> fart jokes too and collect Star Wars dolls also. Wow, impressive.
> ________________________________________________________
>
> Dolls are big and fluffy. The guys who collect the 12" figures collect
> dolls. I collect action figures. I don't know why you think you are going
> to bother me with your comments. I have a youthful streak that will keep me
> young and interesting beyond my years. You? Well, you have cats.
I swear you wrote; ".. young and interesting beyond my Ears." LOL.
Man, I need to have my eyes fixed.
btw - you guys checking out the new animated/CG "Star Wars:The Clone
Wars" movie? I'm iffy myself - I mean, I like that 'animated' look
they have going, and I'm really interested to see how that HD-CGI
looks, but hell if I'm not thrilled about shelling out even MORE cash-
ola to George Fucking Lucas. Talk about your perfect example of right-
place, right-time.
Not to mention feeling hi-jacked every time I go to the concession
stand! We saw the new 'Mummy' flick this weekend - a lot better than
I'd heard IMO - a couple of large popcorns, large drinks, box of
Junior Mints, and a bag of Reese's Pieces = $32.00'ish! Granted you
get free refills on the drinks, but then you're missing the movie for
more liquids which only add to the time missed on a bathroom break.
Oh, and another thing - the SOUND!! Does an audience REALLY need to
feel crumbling buildings, car chases, and gun shot vibration in their
lungs? I don't think so..
|
|
| | Topic: Re: OT - If you want One Thousand Dollars (inside) |
|---|
| Re: OT - If you want One Thousand Dollars (inside) [message #2538] |
Mon, 04 August 2008 08:41 |
Bob Rudd
Messages: 173
Registered: March 2008 |
Senior Member |
|
|
In article <htydncs2iJ3nbQvVnZ2dnUVZ_h3inZ2d@giganews.com>,
alric@cableone.net says...
> Tin@ wrote:
> > On Aug 3, 6:16 pm, Bob Rudd <bobr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> >> In article <DfWdnXtDRooHmQvVnZ2dnUVZ_uCdn...@giganews.com>,
> >> al...@cableone.net says...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Thanatos wrote:
> >>>> In article <MPG.22fe758875dcbde4989...@news.albasani.net>,
> >>>> Bob Rudd <bobr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>>>> In article <atropos-A9BC38.07323802082...@news.giganews.com>,
> >>>>> atro...@mac.com says...
> >>>>>> In article
> >>>>>> <2e694802-b9a3-4183-84a9-901ba6f0b...@z11g2000prl.googlegroups.com>,
> >>>>>> "Tin@" <tinas49...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>>>>> On Aug 1, 6:40 pm, Rocky <no...@nothere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> "Tin@" <tinas49...@yahoo.com> wrote
> >>>>>>>> innews:53be7a09-62c7-44c3-977e-d9de896265a1@a3g2000prm.googlegroups.com:
> >>
> >>>>>>>>> On Aug 1, 5:41 pm, Rocky <no...@nothere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanatos <atro...@mac.com> wrote
> >>>>>>>>>> innews:atropos-C74FC0.20335401082008@new
> >>>>>>>>> s.giganews.com:
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <Xns9AEDBDE98F179notmenoth...@208.49.80.60>,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <no...@nothere.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanatos <atro...@mac.com> wrote in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> news:atropos-D4282F.19275601082008 @news.giganews.com:
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <Xns9AEDB047CBDEBnotmenoth...@208.49.80.60>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <no...@nothere.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I love to watch the extremists glad hand each other. Its
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reminds me of the martians on sesame street, yup yup yup
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> yup yup yup yup
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, but when people who agree with your positions speak
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> up, I bet it's "different", right? No glad-handing there,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> no extremism, and no yupping, I bet.
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have to try harder.
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ive got a stalker
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Get out of your own reflection. How do you fit through doors
> >>>>>>>>>>> with an ego that big?
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The fact that people respond to you in newsgroups that they
> >>>>>>>>>>> frequent does not mean they are stalking you, blinky.
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>> res ipsa loquitur
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>> thanks for playing-
> >>
> >>>>>>>>> I think that means you win, Thanatos
> >>
> >>>>>>>> It means the thing speaks for itself.
> >>
> >>>>>>>> He just proved he is stalking by responding.
> >>
> >>>>>>> Since when is responding to posts in a group "stalking"? Are you
> >>>>>>> now stalking me because you responded to my post....or am I
> >>>>>>> stalking you because I responded to you?
> >>
> >>>>>> Such little details and contradictions are lost on him. When he
> >>>>>> does a thing it's completely "different" than when others do the
> >>>>>> same thing.
> >>
> >>>>> If this guy, with his displaced anger, seriously, has a gun
> >>>>> permit of any type.....IMHO and worth nothing, it should be
> >>>>> considered for being pulled.
> >>
> >>>>> You're a much to generous dude, Than. Few people truly understand
> >>>>> what your job entails and the significant risks you, voluntarily,
> >>>>> agree to take. That's not even considering you may actually loathe
> >>>>> the individuals you would give your life for in protection.
> >>
> >>>> Nah, I don't loathe anyone. You just do the job. You protect the
> >>>> office, not the man.
> >>
> >>> Yeah, you're a real American hero, living on the edge to keep
> >>> American free. I'm sure the stress is tremendous.
> >>
> >> You don't have any idea what he does for a living, do you? He could
> >> have a nice, cushy law practice. He doesn't. He's one of the top
> >> Secret Service agents in the country, you buffoon.
> >> --
> >> I hope we can all be good neighbors online!-
> >
> > Not disputing you, cuz I dont know, but how do you know?
>
> Because Thanatos told him. I've seen Thanatos claim to be a lawyer one time
> and a policeman another, and not long ago, he suggested he was a fireman by
> stating that he's required to go into a burning building to save lives, and
> FREQUENTLY. To puff himself up, he's appropriated the heroic description of
> his "service" as putting himself "in harm's way." He doesn't seem that
> bright to me, in that his thinking is simplistic and very ordinary, and what
> marks him as lacking intelligence is how he's unaware of how obvious he
> really is. And by "obvious" I mean that he -- as is the case in a lot of
> right wingers -- wants to suggest by his "service" that: (1) he's selfless,
> and therefore a morally evolved being (which Rudd, the poor dumb sucker,
> actually swallowed); and (2) their "service" makes peremptory their
> political opinions.
>
> And addressing more of Rudd's remarks, the reason Thanatos doesn't have a
> cushy law practice is because to have a CUSHY law practice, you'd have to be
> very, very good at it. Failing that, there's nothing like a cushy civil
> service job, with it's very nice benefits package, including about twelve
> holidays a year and very nice benefit package.
>
Again, maroon.......Thanatos specifically mentioned certain things
(which I will not go into), that made it very clear to someone like
myself, who is he and exactly what he does. Some of the things he
mentioned are very specifically known only to people who are,
intimately, involved with or have a significantly far deeper
understanding of them, than the general public ever would. The same
applies for some of the specific speech patterns.
The concept of someone acting heroically is one that you, obviously,
cannot begin to understand. John McCain acted heroically on numerous
occasions. Guys like Thenatos do the same, in a different way, every
day.
OTOH, whiners like yourself....well.....
--
I hope we can all be good neighbors online!
|
|
| | Topic: Re: OT - LA Bans Fast Foods |
|---|
| Re: OT - LA Bans Fast Foods [message #2532] |
Mon, 04 August 2008 08:27 |
daveparks
Messages: 146
Registered: April 2008 |
Senior Member |
|
|
On Aug 3, 2:17 pm, tzigaane <tziga...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Suzanne D. wrote:
> > "Seerialmom" <seerial...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:4e665035-069b-411f-95d5-
> >> Nope, Subway was mentioned as exempt because they don't have a drive-
> > thru window and make your items to order.
>
> > That's odd, I have never seen a Subway WITHOUT a drive through window.
> > --S.
>
> In the Seattle area there are practically as many Subways as Starbucks
> and I've never seen a single Subway that does have a drive thru. Many
> Starbucks do have them on the other hand.
>
> tzigaane
Ditto in the Houston area - many stand-alone and drive-thru Starbucks,
in addition to plenty more 'within' existing groceries or other
stores; and Subways, but I've yet to see a Subway with a drive-thru as
well.
I wonder how/if this affects those food 'joints' on-wheels (aka:roach
coaches) that drive around selling all sorts of greasy unhealthy yet
delish; tacos, burritos, chimichangas, flautas, tostadas, etc.?
|
|
| | Topic: Re: OT - If you want One Thousand Dollars (inside) |
|---|
| Re: OT - If you want One Thousand Dollars (inside) [message #2529] |
Mon, 04 August 2008 07:39 |
Alric Knebel
Messages: 48
Registered: April 2008 |
Member |
|
|
Bob Rudd wrote:
> In article <DfWdnXtDRooHmQvVnZ2dnUVZ_uCdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> alric@cableone.net says...
>> Thanatos wrote:
>>> In article <MPG.22fe758875dcbde4989781@news.albasani.net>,
>>> Bob Rudd <bobrudd@verizon.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <atropos-A9BC38.07323802082008@news.giganews.com>,
>>>> atropos@mac.com says...
>>>>> In article
>>>>> <2e694802-b9a3-4183-84a9-901ba6f0b81a@z11g2000prl.googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> "Tin@" <tinas49ers@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 1, 6:40 pm, Rocky <no...@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> "Tin@" <tinas49...@yahoo.com> wrote
>>>>>>> innews:53be7a09-62c7-44c3-977e-d9de896265a1@a3g2000prm.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Aug 1, 5:41 pm, Rocky <no...@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Thanatos <atro...@mac.com> wrote
>>>>>>>>> innews:atropos-C74FC0.20335401082008@new
>>>>>>>> s.giganews.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In article <Xns9AEDBDE98F179notmenoth...@208.49.80.60>,
>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <no...@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanatos <atro...@mac.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>> news:atropos-D4282F.19275601082008 @news.giganews.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <Xns9AEDB047CBDEBnotmenoth...@208.49.80.60>,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <no...@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I love to watch the extremists glad hand each other. Its
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reminds me of the martians on sesame street, yup yup yup
>>>>>>>>>>>>> yup yup yup yup
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, but when people who agree with your positions speak
>>>>>>>>>>>> up, I bet it's "different", right? No glad-handing there,
>>>>>>>>>>>> no extremism, and no yupping, I bet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have to try harder.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ive got a stalker
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Get out of your own reflection. How do you fit through doors
>>>>>>>>>> with an ego that big?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The fact that people respond to you in newsgroups that they
>>>>>>>>>> frequent does not mean they are stalking you, blinky.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> res ipsa loquitur
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> thanks for playing-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think that means you win, Thanatos
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It means the thing speaks for itself.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He just proved he is stalking by responding.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since when is responding to posts in a group "stalking"? Are you
>>>>>> now stalking me because you responded to my post....or am I
>>>>>> stalking you because I responded to you?
>>>>>
>>>>> Such little details and contradictions are lost on him. When he
>>>>> does a thing it's completely "different" than when others do the
>>>>> same thing.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If this guy, with his displaced anger, seriously, has a gun permit
>>>> of any type.....IMHO and worth nothing, it should be considered for
>>>> being pulled.
>>>>
>>>> You're a much to generous dude, Than. Few people truly understand
>>>> what your job entails and the significant risks you, voluntarily,
>>>> agree to take. That's not even considering you may actually
>>>> loathe the individuals you would give your life for in protection.
>>>
>>> Nah, I don't loathe anyone. You just do the job. You protect the
>>> office, not the man.
>>
>> Yeah, you're a real American hero, living on the edge to keep
>> American free. I'm sure the stress is tremendous.
>>
>>
>
> You don't have any idea what he does for a living, do you? He could
> have a nice, cushy law practice. He doesn't. He's one of the top
> Secret Service agents in the country, you buffoon.
If I were you, I'd think over what he tells you, and especially if he tells
you how he puts himself "in harm's way." At one time, he was saying he was
a policeman, arresting people and interrogating them. Not long ago he said
he's required to go into burning buildings to save lives, an outlandish
claim, even if he had been then fireman I assumed him to be. People like
him try their damnedest to impress the rest of us with nonsense like that,
when in fact they're the least impressive of all. I think you better
re-evaluate this guy, and fast, or YOU, sir, will stand as an ass-scratching
baboon. No doubt, he loves the idea that lickspittle like you are declaring
him as a selfless hero while giving him the spit-shine of all spit-shines.
He's not the selfless hero. He's a well-paid civil servant, doing it
because it pays well and provides a very fine benefit package, all at the
taxpayer's largesse. He's a liar if he claims anything else, and you're a
moron if you believe him.
Why are right wingers so pretentious and stupid?
|
|
| | Topic: Re: A strange thought... |
|---|
| Re: A strange thought... [message #2528] |
Mon, 04 August 2008 07:27 |
Alric Knebel
Messages: 48
Registered: April 2008 |
Member |
|
|
fmomoon wrote:
> "zob" <zob@ cox.net> wrote in message
> news:b1fa94h1tg5d4j2g76gjh6k5or9d7cn5kj@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:28:12 -0700, "fmomoon" <fmomoon@comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Has this suddenly become the alt.trash.obama newsgroup? After I
>>> hit "mark read" on those threads, I was left with about 15
>>> messages, including the spam.
>>>
>>> Okay, carry on..
>>
>>
>> I don't know, buit you jiust shamed me into killfiling those threads
>> also even though I've posted in them.
>
> I'm truly sorry, zob, I certainly didn't want to shame you or anyone
> else. I was just complaining. If you enjoy those posts, you don't
> need my approval. . . .
What people like that need is therapy. Those types are in every newsgroup.
They'll insert their political babbel everywhere. It's a disease that
requires they have a target upon which to vent their irrational rage and a
false sense of superiority. If you doubt what I say, stand back and really
evaluate it. Look for a RATIONALE behind their anger. Honestly, do this.
If what they're saying is irrational, then why keep doing it unless
something deeper is going on?
--
______________________________________________
Alric Knebel
http://www.ironeyefortress.com/C-SPAN_loon.html
http://www.ironeyefortress.com
|
|
| | Topic: Re: A strange thought... |
|---|
| Re: A strange thought... [message #2527] |
Mon, 04 August 2008 07:24 |
Alric Knebel
Messages: 48
Registered: April 2008 |
Member |
|
|
Suzanne D. wrote:
> "Seon Ferguson" <seongf@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:48952c02$0$24175$5a62ac22@per-qv1-
>> The liberal haters seem to think so. There even more obsessed with
>> him then the Bush haters are obsessed with Bush. Well maybe not all
>> of them...
>
> Rocky, Salad, and Alric manage to carry some of the annoying political
> bashers weight, but not nearly as much as the others.
> --S.
Actually, what I do is bash the bashers. If you look at everything I've
ever said, that's all I've ever done. EVER. And I'll say it again: these
people like Rudd, Thanatos, and Top Cat suffer from some sort of mental
illness that compels them to bitch about liberals. They're actually bereft
of any ideas beyond anti-liberalism. I drop by just to take a few stabs.
You've never seen me write anything about a political candidate.
Follow the link in my signature about the Right-wing Loon, and you'll
understand why. I'm a liberal; no doubt about it. But as partisan as I am
in my thinking, I never say anything about CONSERVATIVES or conservative
candidates. It's always the frothing nincompoops that I attack. ALWAYS.
--
______________________________________________
Alric Knebel
http://www.ironeyefortress.com/C-SPAN_loon.html
http://www.ironeyefortress.com
|
|
| | Topic: Re: OT/ Question About Political Discussions In NG? |
|---|
| Re: OT/ Question About Political Discussions In NG? [message #2526] |
Sun, 03 August 2008 10:24 |
tinas49ers
Messages: 186
Registered: April 2008 |
Senior Member |
|
|
On Aug 2, 11:59 pm, "Cure_Ewan" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Tin@" <tinas49...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:71a78514-f39f-4148-80b4-42946f39b6d3@r35g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 2, 10:45 pm, "Cure_Ewan" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "zob" <zob@ cox.net> wrote in message
>
> >news:dce294tp7eqt4d33qthi778ua261q81u95@4ax.com...
>
> > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:15:36 -0700 (PDT), "Tin@"
> > > <tinas49...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >>I'm hostile because it doesn't take 2 brain cells to figure to stop
> > >>reading threads that bore you, yet she seems to think we need to hear
> > >>about what bores her, along with her regularly telling people how and
> > >>what to post. She's a control freak.
>
> > > Pot. Kettle. Black.
>
> > zob, that comparison is an insult to marijuana, cookware and people of
> > color
> > throughout the world. ;-P
>
> There's that sophomoric humor that makes us roll our eyes.
> ______________________________________________
>
> Multiple personality disorder much?-
Nope, you?
|
|
| | Topic: Re: OT Fun political test |
|---|
| Re: OT Fun political test [message #2519] |
Sun, 03 August 2008 09:20 |
topcat
Messages: 279
Registered: March 2008 |
Senior Member |
|
|
"Mickey" <mickey_and_edith@sbcnomorephishglobal.net> wrote in message
news:NTblk.3192$zv7.175@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com...
> Cure_Ewan wrote:
>> "Mickey" <mickey_and_edith@sbcnomorephishglobal.net> wrote in message
>> news:1h6kk.34365$ZE5.28896@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>> Rocky wrote:
>>>> I scored a 22
>>>>
>>>> http://franz.org/quiz.htm
>>>>
>>> This is definitely a push poll. It is certainly not a test to determine
>>> one's place on the conservative / liberal continuum (if such is possible
>>> or sensible). Entering ideologically conservative answers can actually
>>> move the total score to the left. For example, having no ban on graphic
>>> pornography is a conservative position (though not necessarily a
>>> Conservative value), yet disagreeing with a ban moves one's score
>>> leftward. Is a ban on "hate speech" a conservative or liberal position?
>>
>> Ahhh, that explains, in part, why I only got a 36. I answered as a
>> Conservative and got dinged for it. I also lost points for the Religious
>> Right and Elders vs. Robertson questions. I feel they are the moveon.org
>> of the Right and I want nothing to do with them. I'm a strict
>> Constitutionalist and am disgusted by the religious wing of our party.
>>
>> Oh, and why is it "Conservative" to trust the USPS more than the
>> Pentagon. The Pentagon deals in secrets and by nature should be trusted
>> less. That's who they are and why we have them. I'm protesting this
>> quiz and feel that I should get a 42 for being right/Right about
>> everything.
>
> I'll give you two points for agreeing with me. You're going to have to
> find the other four points on your own.
>
>
I'll give him two of Bob Rudd's points.
TC
|
|
| | Topic: Re: OT - Obama "Drop It Like A Sock" |
|---|
| Re: OT - Obama "Drop It Like A Sock" [message #2518] |
Sun, 03 August 2008 09:17 |
topcat
Messages: 279
Registered: March 2008 |
Senior Member |
|
|
"Cure_Ewan" <karrde_smuggler_@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:g73io6$agv$1@news.albasani.net...
>
> "Bob Rudd" <bobrudd@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:MPG.22fc699b92cedc07989749@news.albasani.net...
>
>> It would be, perhaps even too cold a commercial for
>> politics....but....the first 30 seconds involves his smackdown with
>> Ludacris while the last 30 shows Snoop singing (via closed captioning)
>> as Obama speaks with pride as to his daughters' musical tastes.
>
> It could be the Willie Horton ad of the 2008 election. I don't think
> McCain has the balls to run it, but if he does, he wins the election.
>
You're right, McLame won't have the balls, BUT, maybe a side group will. Mr
Rudd, how can we get a spot like that on the air? "Paid for by concerned
fans of American Idol"
TC
|
|
| | Topic: Re: OT - Liberals To Police Garbage in SF |
|---|
| | Topic: Re: OT - Obama's Deception *BREAKING* |
|---|
| | Topic: Re: OT - Obama Begins His Offshore Drilling Flip-Flop |
|---|
| | Topic: Re: OT - Obama's Deception *BREAKING* |
|---|
| Re: OT - Obama's Deception *BREAKING* [message #2504] |
Sat, 02 August 2008 11:46 |
crystaline
Messages: 7
Registered: July 2008 |
Junior Member |
|
|
On Aug 2, 2:54 am, Rocky <no...@nothere.com> wrote:
> "azurespirit" <gkn...@hotmail.com> wrote innews:4893feea@newsgate.x-privat.org:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Bob Rudd" <bobr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
> >news:MPG.22fdbdc79861a09c98977d@news.albasani.net...
> >> In article <4893f...@newsgate.x-privat.org>, gkn...@hotmail.com
> >> says...
>
> >>> "Bob Rudd" <bobr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
> >>>news:MPG.22fd0e20389df36b989760@news.albasani.net...
> >>> > In article <624d7239-bb11-4b84-890c-
> >>> > c9e943749...@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, rpj...@yahoo.com
> >>> > says...
> >>> >> No like the crowd of 75,000 that turned out to see him during
> >>> >> the
> >>> >> primary in Oregon, the capacity crowd in the building when he
> >>> >> gave his speech the night he won enough delegates to become the
> >>> >> presumptive nominee with over 20,000 people gathered outside to
> >>> >> hear him.
>
> >>> > Is Obama scared to be in a venue where he can't use a teleprompter
> >>> > or has to directly, one on one, answer questions from randomly
> >>> > selected citizens?
>
> >>> > He better have a 6 point lead in his key states going into
> >>> > Election Day.
>
> >>> > --
> >>> > I hope we can all be good neighbors online!
>
> >>> O'Reilly was very mild-mannered with Hillary. I'm sure he would step
> >>> lightly
> >>> with Obama as well, but ask some well thought out questions. If I
> >>> was a betting person, I'd bet that Obama will appear.
>
> >> It will not happen until it's become a controversy upon itself and
> >> Obama has to appear so as to look like he's man enough to take the
> >> challenge. --
> >> I hope we can all be good neighbors online!
>
> > That's why it WILL happen. There is tape of Obama himself saying he
> > will appear. I can't recall verbatim, but I sort of thought it was
> > going to be after the primary season. I think after Labor Day Mr.
> > Bill will start hammering home the point that Obama has not kept his
> > "promise".
>
> Obama would be insane to go on.
>
> O'Reilly has grabbed and shoved an Obama staffer.
>
> Fox ran stories saying Obama attended a madrassa
>
> Fox ran stories regarding his not wearing the lapel flag pin, calling him
> un Ameircan and communist.
>
> O'reilly talked about a Michelle Obama lynching party, and has made
> numerous attacks against Michelle.
>
> O'Reilly has accused him of plagiarism
>
> O'Reilly claims Obama stages audience members fainting.
>
> O'Reilly stated that Bin Laden would vote for Obama.
>
> And so on and so on ad infinitum
>
> Obama would be insane to reward Faux news and orally with his presence.
>
> There really is absolutely nothing for Obama to gain there.
>
> You may say that the coverage will be great.
>
> He can go on a legitimate news program and get the same coverage.
>
> If he goes on, Ill be shocked, and I actually will think less of him for
> doing so. No way should he reward either Faux or Orally, after the
> treatment they've given him, his wife, and his staff.
I think Barack should go on John Stewart's show;I mean it was good
enough for McCain.
Crystal
|
|
|
Pages (33): [1 ]
Current Time: Sun Sep 5 10:15:53 EDT 2010
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
